Last week I attended a lecture by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and a concert by George Clinton and Parliament. And while I can’t say that the two events resembled each other -- for one, the smell of pot did not linger in the air at the Albright gig as it did during the Parliament show -- I can report that Dr. Albright and Dr. Funkenstein both offered scathing reviews of the Bush Administration and messages of hope for humanity.
Madeleine Albright has long been one of my favorite public figures. I tend to agree with her politics and as much to the point, she’s always struck me as not just incredibly smart but also incredibly sane. She’s also rightfully well-known for her wit, though she never lets her impeccable comic timing overshadow her arguments. She also can, by her own admission, leg-press 400 pounds, so she’s tough in even more ways than you’d expect.
Her presentation at Dorothy Chandler Pavilion last week was largely a passionate and well-articulated criticism of the Bush Administration, specifically its handling of the war in Iraq. President Bush has left himself and thus our country with “no good options,” she said. Our soldiers are now mired in a civil war that renders them unable to discern who is friend or foe and so “they don’t know who to shoot at until they’re shot at first, which is untenable.”
She also discussed Russia, China, Kosovo, Darfur, Sudan, New Orleans and the growing gap between the rich and the poor in this country, but inevitably kept returning to the President and the damage she believes he has done to the country’s stature and influence as a world leader. Among her accusations: destabilizing the Middle East, ceding our country’s moral authority through the prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib, severely straining relations with our European allies and squandering diplomatic gains of the Clinton Administration, such as those with Kim Jong Il. Infusing a bit of levity into things, Albright, who met with the Dear Leader to negotiate the discontinuation of his nuclear missile program added, “Our intelligence on him was totally wrong. They told me he was crazy and a pervert. He’s not crazy.”
I’ll admit I’ve been a George Clinton and Parliament fan a lot longer than I’ve been an Albright admirer -- pretty much since they first started cranking out the funk hits in the late 1970s. For a fair number of us of a certain age and sensibility, it takes nothing more than the first few bars of “Tear the Roof Off the Sucker” or “Flashlight” to make us freeze in our tracks, drop whatever we may be holding and begin to dance.
I’ll cut to the chase and tell you that the show was smokin’ -- really one of the best I’ve ever been to. The Parliament lineup has morphed over the years (alas, I’ve never seen Bootsy Collins perform as part of the band) but it’s still a huge menagerie of guitars, horns, drums, bass and synthesizers -- at least a dozen people onstage at any given time -- with the requisite outrageous costumes, dancers and freaks. There were feathers and short-shorts and a male guitarist in a wedding gown and of course George was sporting his hot pink and blue dreadlocks.
The humor that I love so much has tended to overshadow the insanely excellent and innovative musicianship of Clinton and the band. They were in full force last week, storming through an extraordinary set that spanned 30 years of rock, funk and R&B and lasted almost four hours without a break. It seemed as if they would never stop the show.
Clinton formed his bands in part as political expression in the late 1960s and there has always been a political current running between the psychedelia and bass line of his music. Just listen to Chocolate City sometime. Indeed, midway through last week’s show, one of his guitarists hoisted a banner over his head that read, “F*** Bush.” Raw, yes, but the crowd roared. And, really, though Albright’s version was far more articulate and substantive and offered actual solutions, her assessment of the President was not much different from Clinton’s. I’m paraphrasing, but essentially she said, “We have two more years of this guy and then hopefully we'll be able to begin undoing some of the damage he has wrought.” And the Dorothy Chandler crowd was no less noisy in its approval of that sentiment than the Parliament audience.
Both Madeleine and George in their very different ways also communicate a fundamental belief that the world can become a better place. As Albright told the crowd, her deep commitment to this country and its people was formed when, upon arriving as a young Czech immigrant, she found herself wholly and unequivocally accepted. Since then she has always wanted to give something back and believes that while the world’s problems are extraordinarily difficult, not all of them are intractable. In other words, there is hope. George’s version may seem of another planet and surely incorporates the word “booty” much more frequently, but there really is a consistency. Ironically, hardly anyone has had their words and music sampled as heavily by hip hop artists and rappers, yet his music has never been about guns and misogyny. His is a language of pleasure, but also of empowerment and faith in the human spirit. As George himself has said -- and I expect Madeleine would concur -- “You don’t need the bullet when you’ve got the ballot.”
